|
The goal of
world community with
peace, liberty,
and justice for all.
INTRODUCTION:
Before I started writing a draft of my sermon last week on peace,
liberty, justice and world community, I made the mistake of listening
and reading the news. I heard what’s happening in Tallahassee; moved on
to Washington, and checked on the U.S. Senate and the House of
Representatives; then I jumped to Oslo, and what’s taking place on the
Nobel Peace Prize; to Portugal and our beleaguered president’s meeting
with NATO allies; to Berlin and the reception the European Union gave to
America’s Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Benanke. There was an update on
Afghanistan and Iraq; and for a real upper, I read about Israel and the
Palestinians. And while I was at it, there was a cholera outbreak 90
miles off the Eastern shore in Haiti, and it’s slipping into the
Dominican Republic. Rape, hunger, and disease are rife in parts of
Africa and Asia, with AIDS and HIV set to double in S. Africa. Just
across the border from Texas, there are areas where rival narcotics
gangs have destroyed the rule of law. Some have done so with guns
purchased freely in America with the help of the NRA. And other gangs
have bribed all the police with the millions that flow in from our
narcotics market. And just in case you hadn’t heard, the Artic is
melting and the sea level is rising. That was the news one night last
week.
In contrast, the
topic of my sermon today is the 6th principle and practice of
Unitarian Universalism: “We
covenant to affirm and promote: The goal of world community with peace,
liberty, and justice for all.”
Really. Peace? Justice? Liberty? World Community? What world are we
talking of? Not the one in the news, for sure.
It reminded me of a
professional trip I took several years ago, flying from New York to
London for one of a series of monthly meetings with the Rank
Organization in London. Before our actual meeting began, one of the
persons present asked me how my trip had gone. And in the process of the
conversation that followed, I told him about just having been in Los
Angeles the week before and seeing the stage production of
Man of La Mancha.
I also told them how
great I thought the theme song,
The Impossible Dream,
was.
In response, with
that perfect upper class British accent, one of my hosts said, “Oh, yes!
It’s so typically American, don’t you think?” I gathered he was saying,
it was so upbeat, so positive and hopeful. Not real world. Not the
reality we really face.
These many years
later, on this Thanksgiving Week, most of us would agree that in at
least the last ten years, America has taken a blow to the solar plexus
around the world: clout, prestige, money, you name it and we have lost
it big time.
That’s why two years
ago, when the Bush administration finally ended, I remember being so
filled with hope that there really was a chance to change the disastrous
direction of our nation, both here at home and around the world. There
was such optimism…such expectation…such hope. America had even elected
an African-American president with incredible promise, and his election
had such wide-spread support.
Little did we know
that Republicans were meeting and planning how to reverse all of that.
They concluded that the only way to get back in power was to oppose
every single legislative effort the president put forth. Mom and apple
pie wouldn’t have had a chance. And for those pieces of legislation that
somehow managed to pass, they determined as a matter of policy to use
the process to emasculate them as much as possible, and then still vote
against them.
It was a version of
barbarian invasion: rape, pillage and burn, or say No! say No! say No!
And after two years of “No,” they were not held accountable at the
polls, but the president and any one who supported him was blamed.
Nov. 2nd
hit like a tsunami. Not only did it seem like all the cards were swept
off the table, but also it seems as if a whole new set of players is
taking over. And two of the senior, most liberal and respected African
American lawmakers are going down in flames because of misuse of money.
And as the Minority
Leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell, has clearly stated, his singular task as
the Majority Leader in the next two years is to insure that the
African-American we elected to the presidency with such expectation and
hope is not, repeat: is not going to be reelected.
To add insult to
injury, this past week the George W. Bush Library broke ground at my
alma mater, Southern Methodist University, in Dallas. I sent a letter to
the University’s President, along with a $50 check which meant he would
have to answer my letter, suggesting that they construct a Torture
Center across the street for fund-raising purposes.
Now as I mentioned,
this week as I was trying to focus on “world community, peace, liberty,
and justice for all,” I made the mistake of turning on the news – the
PBS News Hour.
As I watched and listened, I thought for a moment, surely this is a new
Broadway play entitled, “Going to
hell in a handbasket.”
But it wasn’t. It was that day’s news, which wasn’t any worse than the
day before, and no better than the day after.
So what do we do?
What do we say about faith and hope and love? Does world community
really have a chance? Are those really viable values in today’s real
world – the one where money buys the governorship of Florida…where
lobbyists and money-access determine far too many legislative votes in
Congress? What does faith have to say at this time and place? Is there
anything that can give us some guidelines…some reason to hope?
SCRIPTURE
As I’ve mentioned
before, the great Swiss theologian Karl Barth, once said that every
minister should prepare her or his sermon with the Bible in one hand,
and the daily newspaper in the other. So from yesterday’s “Opinion Page”
of the Wall Street Journal,
I want to
share a piece written by Bernard Baruch, and read by him on CBS radio in
1953. (To give you a little context, 1953 would have been eight years
after the end of World War II, and nearing the end of the three years we
were involved in the Korean War; plus, the Democrat <and Unitarian>
Adlai Stevenson had just been defeated by a Republican, Dwight
Eisenhower.) Mr. Baruch, a liberal, enlightened Democrat, had been an
adviser to Presidents Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman, and died at age 95
in 1965, twelve years after he wrote the following. Here’s in part what
he said. I invite you to think of it as contemporary scripture:
When I was a younger man, I believed
that progress was inevitable—that the world would be better tomorrow and
better still the day after. But the thunder of war, the stench of
concentration camps, the mushroom cloud of the atomic bomb are not
conducive to optimism….
Yet my faith in the future, though
somewhat shaken, is not destroyed. I still believe in it. If I sometimes
doubt that humankind will achieve our potentialities, I never
doubt that we can….
The reality is that paradise is not for
this world. All people cannot be masters, but none need to be a slave.
We cannot cast out pain from the world, but needless suffering we can.
Tragedy will be with us in some degree as long as there is life, but
misery can be banished. Injustice will raise its head in the best of all
possible worlds, but tyranny we can conquer. Evil will invade some
people’s hearts, intolerance will twist some people’s minds, but decency
is a far more common human attribute, and it can be made to prevail in
our daily lives….
I have known, as who has not, personal
disappointments and despair. But always the thought of tomorrow has
buoyed me up. I have looked to the future all my life. I still do. I
still believe that with courage and intelligence we can make the future
bright with fulfillment.
That’s a Democrat
talking, just after they lost the election, not only to a Republican,
but an Army General. Plus we were finishing a meaningless war that left
more than 58,000 American soldiers dead, and untold numbers damaged
psychically. But note that he wrote:
“I still believe that with courage and
intelligence we can make the future bright with fulfillment.”
That’s
the scripture from the newspaper. Remember though, Karl Barth didn’t say
for a preacher to read just the newspaper when preparing his sermon; he
also said, read the Bible. So here is a secret copy of Christian
scripture that I sneaked in, from which I want to read a favorite verse
of mine.
This
comes from the Gospel of John,
the one written some 80 or so years after the death of Jesus. That means
it is after Christian Jews have been barred from the synagogues by the
rabbis, because of their insisting that Jesus was the Messiah. It was
also after the Romans had torn down King Solomon’s temple and forced all
the Jews to flee their homeland. That explains in part why a Greek whose
identity we will never know, and who hates Jews, is writing under the
pseudonym of a disciple of Jesus known as John; and in so doing, he’s
writing a much more learned, theologically informed gospel about Jesus,
than either of the Gospels of
Matthew, Mark or Luke,
all of which were written 40 or 50 years earlier.
For those of you not
familiar with the story of Jesus as
John
tells it, let me say briefly that Jesus has had great success early on
in his brief ministry. According to all of the texts, large crowds
thronged his appearances. But there was also a problem: The nation of
Israel was occupied by the Roman Empire; those Jewish leaders selected
to administer the local government were walking a very tight rope,
serving two masters: their Roman masters, and their own Jewish people.
Militias and armed uprisings against the Romans were common. And
periodically, some religious zealot would come along and embolden the
people, and get their hopes up about what they could and could not do.
Which is what Jesus
had done…and the people loved him for it…which meant they were
potentially out of the control of either the Jewish leaders or the
Roman. For sure, they were not paying attention to their leaders. And
something happened…a collusion occurs between those with vested
interests in maintaining the status quo, namely Jewish accommodators
working with Roman Occupiers.
According to
John,
Jesus realizes that he is in deep jell-o. One of his disciples, Judas
Iscariot, has betrayed him to the Roman authorities, and at this very
moment, Judas is bringing soldiers to where Jesus has gathered his
disciples together for a last minute,
“Here’s-what-you-need-to-do-when-I’m-gone” song. With the troops
nearing, and everything Jesus had worked for, down the tube, in the near
shadow of the coming cross, he makes this incredible statement (John
16:33),
“Be of good cheer; I have
overcome the world.”
Or as Bernard Baruch
put it, “…always the thought of
tomorrow has buoyed me up. I have looked to the future all my life. I
still do. I still believe that with courage and intelligence we can make
the future bright with fulfillment.”
The disciples of
Jesus might reasonably have asked, “Are we talking about this world?”
Or, my British host might have said, “How quaint. How typically
American, don’t you think?”
So what do we say
and do about freedom, justice and liberty in response to the real
world…the disappointing world…the unequal world?
APPLICATION
First, we have
always to remember that freedom is an inner experience before it’s an
outward expression. It’s an inside job.
I read once of a
priest who was sentenced when only a young man, by the psychopathic
Russian dictator Josef Stalin, to the brutally cold regions of Siberia.
He worked as did the others, but he also provided the Mass when
possible, heard confessions, and went about the work of a priest, even
though in prison. Twenty-five years later, word came down that he was
being freed. His comrades in prison were overjoyed for him, but he
didn’t seem to make a big deal out of it. Finally, one of them asked
him, “Father, you’re going to be released from prison. After all these
years, you’re going to be free.” The priest looked at him, calmly and
said, “Even though I was imprisoned, I’ve always been free.”
If that
sounds somewhat esoteric, or too good to be true, let me ask you this
question: Doesn’t that same point also apply to that marvelous Burmese
woman, known as Aung San Suu Kyi, the duly elected leader of Burma 20
years ago, who since 1990 has been under house arrest by its generals
for 15 of the last 21 years?
She has
received the
Sakharov Prize for
Freedom of Thought,
the
Nobel Peace Prize,
the
Nehru Award for International Understanding,
and the
International Simón
Bolívar Prize
from the
government of
Venezuela.
Saturday, a week
ago, on November 13, when she was released again from house arrest and
permitted by the military to move about and to engage with others, there
was no doubt who was the freest person in Burma, and it wasn’t the
generals. It was: Aung San Suu Kyi. She was still free: Inside!
Secondly, let me
add to that first point:
We always underestimate our
ability to exercise our freedom.
Freedom is never
about the majority: It’s about individuals. Changes aren’t brought about
in our society by majorities. The majority of Americans didn’t even care
enough to vote Nov. 2nd. Changes in our society are brought
about by informed citizens who actively seek to insure freedom for all
Americans.
Third, freedom
means we have the capacity to fulfill the good within us.
So many unfree
people want to identify free people as born sinners…that by nature we
are sinful people. That’s wrong. By nature we are good. As I’ve said
before:
If we were bad by nature, we would feel
good when we did bad, and we would feel bad when we did good. The
reality is that every human being feels good when we do good and bad
when we do bad because by nature we are good.
The challenge is
always to give rise to the good within us rather than the bad.
CONCLUSION
At Thanksgiving, I
love to tell this story about the 18th century English
clergyman, Matthew Henry, who was robbed on the way to church. In his
diary, he wrote a prayer of thanksgiving, which read:
Let me be thankful first, because I had
never been robbed before; second, because although they took my
billfold, they did not take my life; third, because although they took
all the money I had, it was not much; and fourth, because it was I who
was robbed, not I who robbed.
Shalom. Salaam Aleikum. Amen. And
Blessed Be.
|