|
FROM SECULARISM TO “NONE’S”:
Where Former
Secularists Derive Their Spiritual
understanding.
INTRODUCTION:
As I’ve mentioned before, I wrote a book a decade or three ago, entitled, I
Once Spoke in Tongues. It was an attempt to come to terms with the
Pentecostal heritage in which I was reared, but had left.
I knew without question that it would cause
great concern for my father, and sure enough some time after it was published,
Mother and Dad came up from Waco, Texas to Oklahoma City to visit my family and
me. I waited with some apprehension at what I knew would be an emotional and
painful experience for us both. In fact, I had written in that book about a
similar conversation Dad broached after learning of a substantive theological
dispute my brother and I had engaged in.
Now though it was not a disagreement
about what I had said about faith and belief to my brother, or he said that I
said, or I said that he said. No, it was in a book, in black and white…about the
bible…about speaking in tongues…about faith and beliefs.
Surprisingly, the subject did not
come up for the week or so they were there visiting – until they were ready to
leave. Dad requested again that we go in the library where we could talk. We did
and he closed the door. He disclosed that he had a copy of my book and had read
it very carefully.
(As an aside, my father was not an “educated
man” in the sense of a formal education. In fact, the last grade he attended in
school was the 7th, and that was only due to the rancher for whom he
worked entrusting him to drive the wagon to take the rancher’s 12 year old
daughter to the little one room school house closest to the ranch in New Mexico
where Dad was working. Once there, the teacher allowed Dad to sit in the back
row, where he listened and learned.
Then when he became a Christian and chose to
enter the ministry, he went to his denomination’s fledgling college in Checotah,
Oklahoma, where he was tutored and taught, mostly by his English teacher, whom
he eventually wound up marrying. Mother’s tutoring continued and Dad spent a
lifetime with his head in a book or the bible. Now he had retired from active
ministry.)
And on this day in the library, he asked,
“Wayne, do you know how much I love you and how proud I am of you?” I answered
that I knew that, and how important it had always been. Then he asked, “Have you
ever known me to lie to you or not to tell you the truth?” I told him I had
never known him to lie and I believed that he had always told me the truth.
Then, he looked me straight in the eye and said,
“Well, son, if you know that I love you as much or more than anyone alive, and
you know that I’ve never lied to you, why would you not believe what I’ve taught
and preached all these years about Pentecost and the Holy Spirit?”
What was really happening is something that many
of you have experienced, namely, life, time and experience combined to lead you
away from the church of your heritage. It’s not always easy. In my case, I tried
to answer honestly and yet with love and respect for one of the most important
persons in my life. In fact, I’ve always cherished the memory of that occasion,
because I knew the love that drove it.
As for the book, it’s had four different
publishers, plus one in Spanish. And I discovered after loaning a copy to Midge
Magstadt, that neither of us agreed with one of its major conclusions.
But Dad was right: I had changed and part of that was due to being significantly
influenced by my first three years of graduate theological studies. And there
were several professors who made a great deal of difference, especially, Dr.
Schubert Ogden.
One of his most important books was,
Christ without myth, which I read and studied so much, that it was almost
like a second bible. And the “Secularization Theory” under girding it was a
distinct belief about the future. It was this:
In the coming years ahead, belief in God
would gradually recede in the face of science and technology, which would then
usher in a secular worldview. Religion would slowly fade into the background
unless it was able to change and become relevant to “modern man.” And while
there might be a small segment of society kicking and screaming, refusing to
enter into the new reality, the world would pass them by.
A popular book of the time was, The Secular
Meaning of the Gospel. It asked this question: “How may a Christian, who is
a secular person, understand the Gospel in a secular way?”
As we all know, that perspective
couldn’t have been more wrong. In the last 30 years, religion has prospered more
than ever. The reason is this: What few if any of us knew back then was that the
inclination towards spirituality in human beings is
most probably biologically or genetically predetermined, rather than being the
result of one’s experience or environment.
Neurologist
Dr. David Comings proposes that
spirituality is genetically hardwired into a specific part of the brain. He
states that spirituality is pleasurable, that it’s critical to the evolution and
survival of human beings, and that it will never go away.
A recent study by Dartmouth
Medical School and the YWCA reported that, human beings are biologically primed
to do three things:
1. seek inner moral direction
2. seek spiritual meaning, and
3. seek for a spiritual connection to
the Transcendent.
The study
concludes that this priming is an innate impulse that stems from our brain’s
capacity for consciousness or self-awareness. Put another way, the awareness of
our uniqueness as a species is the source of our drive to connect to the
spiritual. This drive is a process present across cultures and time. It seems to
be a biologically-based component of human development. It’s associated with
spiritual practices such as contemplative prayer and meditation. It suggests
again that our capacity and desire for spiritual experience are, to some degree,
hard-wired.
So, while science and technology may have
advanced in incredible ways, it has not been at the expense of religion, or of
people’s desire and need for a spiritual perspective to life.
Anthropologists agree that as far back
as we have evidence of human activity; there is a universal human capacity to
wonder at the mysteries of birth, life, death, and the Cosmos. We have need to
make sense of those mysteries, to find meaning to their power, to understand the
strange circumstances in which we find ourselves, here on the edges of the Milky
Way Galaxy.
That’s especially so when we read or
listen to something like the new physics’ theory of the Universe. It proposes
that our Universe is composed of vibrating strings of energy. In the way that
the strings of a cello or violin can make a multitude of sounds, so quantum
strings of energy have created a multitude of forms. Which means that according
to this theory, the Universe is like one grand, awesome symphony orchestra,
playing beautiful music.
Further, these same scientists tell us
that there are at least eleven dimensions of reality that are a part of our
Universe which are all happening simultaneously. We may be participating in any
one or more of them at the same time. That means that at any given moment, we
face an infinite number of possibilities and choices with our lives.
So
there’s little question that in the last several decades, science and technology
have advanced enormously. (A teacher told me that recently she had a student ask
her to tell their class what it was like before there were cell phones – you
know, back in the “olden days!”)
But
what happened to religion in that same period of scientific and technological
advance?
According to a 2008 “Faith in Flux,” survey by the Pew Forum on Religion
and Public Life, many Americans change their religious affiliation at least once
in their lives. And the largest-growing group out of what the report poetically
describes as the “churn within American religion,” is the “unaffiliated” — those
who check, “None of the above.” Or what someone has called, “NONE’s.”
The report suggests that
some of the factors responsible for this are these: one, is generational shifts:
The phases of life that we go through in modern society can cause us to reorient
our religious identity; second, spiritual needs may not always be fulfilled in
conventional religious settings.
Another cause is the
huge delay in so many religious institutions to come to grips with social
inequities in society.
n
Many of
you have read Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail.
What we are not always as aware of is that he wrote it in response to eight
mainstream clergymen opposed to his social activism. The mainstream church and
the synagogue were a major obstacle to racial change in the South.
n
Or what
about the issue of women and church leadership. It is absolutely
incomprehensible to me that Roman Catholics can refuse ordination and priesthood
to women, and even punish those who push for it – ditto for the same
recalcitrance by Southern Baptists.
n
It is
equally mind-boggling that any church could join in to oppress and ridicule
lesbian women and gay men.
So no small wonder that
a significant transition is taking place among a growing number of people who
have deep spiritual longings, but are turned off by what they see in the
institutional church. That’s a way of saying that for many NONEs, they recognize
that faith by itself is incomplete. It must be willing to demonstrate that what
it preaches is what it practices. It must be willing to enter into the arena of
human and social need, to identify with the oppressed, to march against
inhumanity, and to stand with those whom others shun.
There are many NONEs here among us. They/we may
even be a majority. Much of what All Faiths tries to be is shaped by the same
concerns articulated above. But what about the spiritual factor? How does it
impact who we are?
APPLICATION.
1.
If we try to stay in tune with the Cosmos, then our faith and religious
practices will always be in flux. What we believed yesterday was in response to
yesterday’s world; today’s has changed.
a.
It’s like my golf game when I was playing regularly. I cannot tell you
how many times I solved my swing problem, and left the course feeling the issue
was resolved…only to come back the next time with a different problem. And my
golfing buddies learned that if I had taken a golf lesson, they would
automatically double every bet. Adapting to change would take time. But you know
what: I watched Tiger Woods a couple of weeks ago, and he was missing shots too.
Everyone does, because we are all a part of the change constantly going on in
our Universe.
Yesterday is passed, tomorrow is not yet come, but today – today is already
here.
2.
Change in our life and world mean that our spiritual practices must
change as well.
n
There was a time as a young Pentecostal Holiness minister when I read 10
chapters in the New Testament, every night…on my knees. It was one of my life’s
richest spiritual periods.
n
There have been times when I spent every morning for at least 30 minutes in
prostration as I listened to Gregorian chants.
n
There have been other times and other places and other practices: But the point
is that sometimes it is necessary to change our practice to be in touch and in
tune with the Cosmos as we are experiencing it at that moment.
CONCLUSION.
The great 14th century Sufi Muslim Persian (now Iran) poet,
Shabistara, wrote the following. (In the Garden of Mystery). Remember,
this is from the 14th century and it’s Islamic:
The Universe is human, and the human a Universe.
It can not be made any clearer than this.
Know that the world from end to end is a mirror.
In each atom blaze one hundred shining suns.
If you cleave the heart of a drop of water,
a hundred pure oceans will flow from it.
Every speck of dust, carefully examined,
reveals thousands of humans teeming within.
A gnat’s legs are like those of an elephant.
A drop of water, suggests the great River Nile.
From the core of a seed, spring a hundred harvests.
A whole world comes out of a seed of grass.
Spirit dwells in a mosquito’s wings,
heaven’s sphere in the point of its eye.
In the niche of the core of the heart,
the Lord of the Two worlds makes a home.
Hiding behind the veil of each and every atom,
Is the enlivening beauty of the Beloved’s face.
Shalom. Salaam Aleikum. Amen. And blessed be.
MEDITATION
There is a beautiful Sufi chant that
goes like this:
The ocean refuses no river, no
river.
The open heart refuses no part of
me, no part of you.
I am one with all that is, one with
all;
All that is, is one with me, one
with all.
|