|
THE FUTURE: Our
Legacy!
INTRODUCTION: Several
years ago, I was called in as a fund-raising consultant to a rehabilitation
hospital in Denver, Colorado. Three wings had been built, but a fourth had
stalled and stood incomplete. In the process, I became good friends with the
Executive Vice-President. I flew in one morning for a meeting, and went into
his office. In the process of the meeting, I asked, “What is standing in the
way of construction restarting?” He said, “We’re finished.” I frowned and
asked, “What do you mean? I just walked by and it’s not even halfway done?’
He said, “Oh, that.” Then he pointed to the architect’s rendering and said,
“We’ve made the decision to finish. That is the big step.”
I’ve thought about that many
times since: Making the decision as to what we want to do is the biggest
hurdle; how, what, when, and where always follow. It’s never the reverse.
Back in February 2001, some
100 or so of us met at Gulf Harbour Golf and Country Club. The question was,
did we want to found a new, liberal religious congregation in SW Florida?
Until then, it had only been a figment in the imagination of a few of us.
Without a dime in our treasury – actually without a bank account, without
any members, without even a name, much less a place to meet, we decided:
Yes, we wanted to found a new, liberal religious congregation: All Faiths
Unitarian Congregation.
THE FIRST
QUESTION: facilities.
The situation in which we are giving voice to that
question today is very much like that: Do we want a “home of our own?”
We don’t have a penny in a building fund; we don’t even have a building
fund; we don’t have a location or a building selected. But the question is,
do we want a home of our own? When we say yes to that question, then and
only then can we proceed to address the issues it broaches.
I want you to do something
with me: What could All Faiths look like in ten years – if we
really dreamed? If we really imagined? Again the question: What could All
Faiths look like in 2018? Again, close your eyes and imagine. I’ll
signal when to open them. <Allow one minute.> Now for 3 minutes, share what
you envisioned with someone nearby.
Now let’s do the same thing,
but for a different timeframe: What could All Faiths look like in five
years to make the ten year dream reality – if we really dreamed? If we
really imagined? Again the question: What could All Faiths look like in
2013? Again, close your eyes and imagine. I’ll signal when to open them.
<Allow one minute.> Now for three minutes, share what you envisioned with
someone nearby.
For the next minute, envision
your dream for what All Faiths will need to be in one year – if we put feet
to our dream for five years and ten years from now? If we really imagined,
what will All Faiths look like in 2009? Again, close your eyes and imagine.
I’ll signal when to open them. <Allow one minute.>
Now hold all that in abeyance
for a moment as we consider the second question:
THE SECOND
QUESTION: ministerial succession.
I’m well aware that merely asking the previous set of
questions poses another question. I’ll put it in the third person for
discussion purposes. It goes like this.
Were we to get serious,
could we develop a multi-year plan to transition to the time when Wayne is
no longer available to be the full-time minister of All Faiths?
Without our having a plan, will any minister ever
telephone and ask for the position? No. Will she or he ever write a letter
asking if the position is available? No. Would anyone anywhere in the United
States even know about the opening? No. We have to have a plan.
The question is not, what happens when Wayne
is no longer available as full-time minister; rather, the question is,
what is our plan for when Wayne is no longer available to serve as full-time
minister?
Once we have a plan, there will be a long
line of people applying. Let me give you an example: Have you heard the
expression, “Sell the sizzle, not the steak.” The sizzle is this: There are
a lot of liberal religious ministers in America freezing every winter in the
cold thinking, ‘Gosh, wouldn’t it be great to spend my last five years of
ministry in Florida.’” And for every one of those ministers – and they
number in the hundreds, if not the thousands – have we got a congregation
for them. A great salary, a great congregation, a great place to live, and a
superb finishing challenge for their last five years. They can preach, they
know ministry, and they are not fresh out of school.
I promise you, if you break
out of inside the box thinking, there will be a list of ministers lining up
to be considered who would love to spend their last five years of ministry
in Florida. These are experienced ministers, who have superb skills in the
pulpit, and are highly trained theologically.
Now let me say that I have no
intentions of retiring now or any time soon; but when that time arrives –
five or ten years from now – All Faiths needs to have a plan in place.
THE THIRD
QUESTION: affiliation.
What about affiliation? Currently, our name is our only
identity: All Faiths Unitarian Congregation. We use Unitarian Universalist
Hymnbooks, and my ministerial credentials are with the Unitarian
Universalist Association in Boston. Many of our members, both year-round,
and seasonal, are also UU. But there are many others who have had no UU
ties, or only short ones based on my four years at Shire Lane.
But we have no formal ties.
The UU congregation on Shire Lane has just now called its 7th
minister in eight years – four interims and three settled. She’s fresh out
of seminary, with no experience. I’m very hopeful that as she gains
confidence and strength in her position that our congregations can join
together in social justice efforts in our community. Whether that requires
UU affiliation is debatable.
Personally, after 7½ years of
thinking differently, I now believe that our overriding objective should be
to develop our own strengths and let affiliation take its own course,
naturally.
<Stop for
Joys and Concerns>
CONCLUSION.
Flannery O’Connor tells the story of the Irish children
on their way home from school. As they walked through the fields and
pastures, they would come to these formidable rock walls built over the
centuries. They were so high that the kids could not climb over them. Their
response? They threw their caps over the wall. That meant they had to find a
way to get over. Which usually meant joining together and finding a
solution.
That’s our challenge too. Whether it’s a home
of our own, insuring a timely and successful ministerial succession, or what
to do about affiliation. We need to decide what we want to do first, then
commit to using our best efforts to make it happen.
So let’s not worry about costs and interests
rates and what this bank will or won’t do. Let’s determine what we want to
do, devise our strategy, and then do it.
CONVERSATION CAFÉ.
Now it’s your turn. First, I want us to get in groups
of four to five. That’s one of the good things about meeting here: We can
move around as we wish. Don’t worry about the seating. They have to be
rearranged anyway.
In a minute, I want you to
start discussing the issues of facilities, ministerial succession, and
affiliation. Agree together on the question you want to ask. We will go from
group to group so that everyone has an opportunity to be heard.
Also, in your group,
determine who you want to represent you at the microphone. I would recommend
that this not be a board member, since it’s the board that is soliciting
input from the congregation.
Okay, let’s get in groups,
and I will start calling on you in five minutes, one group at a time. The
first question will be on facilities; after that we will focus on
ministerial succession; and last on affiliation.
Okay, in your group what do
you want to ask about facilities?
<after five minutes of group discussion, followed by
their questions, move to ministerial succession, then to affiliation>
|